|
Commentary
|
|
Go
back to the previous section of this chapter...
Go
back to the book home page... |
|
Commentary
|
|
|
1-1 |
Our Constitution is the longest serving written
national Constitution in the world.
In this chapter, we will briefly review the history
of our Constitution, together with background information from
English and American legal history. Our focus is on provisions
regarding both impeachment, and other Constitutional ways of
removing office holders from office. This background information is
essential to understand the Constitutional theory advanced in
Chapter Three. The nub of that Constitutional theory, and the
primary thesis of this book, is as follows: If a President is
impeached by the House of Representatives based on allegations of a
criminal violation of a Federal Statute, there are two
Constitutional ways to remove the President from office. One way of
removal is by Conviction in a Senate impeachment trial. However, a
second way of removal from office is Conviction in a Judiciary
criminal trial that commences based on the House Articles of
Impeachment. The relevant Constitutional provision is this, from
Article Two, Section 4: "The President, Vice President and all civil
Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on
Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high
Crimes and Misdemeanors." Until the Clinton impeachment proceeding,
the universally accepted interpretation of the word "Conviction" in
this passage has been that it refers to conviction by the Senate. As
you will see in Chapter Three, supported by the background
information of this chapter, the word "Conviction" in this crucial
Constitutional passage refers properly to either Senate conviction
in an impeachment trial, or Judicial conviction in a criminal trial.
You are now headed in the direction of that conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
1-2 |
Our Constitution and
the Convention of 1787
Our unamended Constitution was written by a
Convention of fifty-five men, chosen as delegates by the thirteen
original States. They deliberated from May 25, 1787 until September
17, 1787 when the Constitution was approved to be forwarded to the
Continental Congress. The Convention recommended to Congress that
the Constitution should be submitted to State Conventions for
ratification. The decision to approve the Constitution would be
based on each State’s yes or no vote to either ratify, or not
ratify, the unamended Constitution. The Constitution was to become
effective when nine States had ratified. [1] State ratifying
conventions could and did suggest amendments, but this was separate
from each State’s yes or no ratification vote. |
|
|
|
|
1-3 |
The Convention had been called when it became more
and more clear that the current national governing plan, the
Articles of Confederation, was fundamentally failing to meet the
vital requirement of providing a national government with sufficient
power and authority to defend the United States against threats from
European powers. Although the United States existed under the
Articles of Confederation, it existed more as a trans-national
organization, such as NATO, than as a national government. Under the
Articles of Confederation, what are today individual States of the
United States were in many ways more like small, independent
nations. |
|
|
|
|
1-4 |
Although the Articles of Confederation was recognized
to have many serious weaknesses, ratification of the newly drafted
Constitution was by no means a foregone conclusion. Mr. Gerry of
Massachusetts, one of the three delegates who refused to sign,
stated "...his fears that a Civil war may result from the present
crisis of the U.S." [2] From December 7, 1787 to January 9, 1788,
Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia and Connecticut became
the first five ratifying states, Pennsylvania 46 yeas and 23 nays,
Connecticut 128 yeas and 40 nays, the remaining three unanimous. On
February 6, 1788 Massachusetts ratified on a close vote of 187 yeas
and 168 nays, and recommended nine amendments. Maryland and South
Carolina then ratified, both by better than two to one votes. |
|
|
|
|
1-5 |
The Constitution became effective, and law for the
nine ratifying States, when New Hampshire’s Convention voted 57 yea
and 47 nay on June 21, 1788. The next two ratifying States were
closely divided: Virginia’s June 25, 1788 vote was 89 yeas and 79
nays, and New York ratified July 26, 1788 by 30 yeas and 27 nays.
Although the Constitution was technically in effect, the approval of
New York and Virginia was still crucial to the practical success of
the plan. Refusal to ratify by either of these two large States
would have separated the approving States into two distinct
geographical regions, blocking a convenient overland connection. On
September 30, 1788 Pennsylvania became the first State to select
Senators under the Constitution. George Washington became our first
President February 4, 1789, although at that time North Carolina and
Rhode Island had still not ratified the Constitution. On May 29,
1790 Rhode Island became the last state to join the United States of
America, on a vote of 34 yeas and 32 nays. [3]
|
|
|
|
|
1-6 |
It is beyond the scope of this book to consider many
of the controversies that surround the origins and ratification of
the Constitution. There was concern at the time that a powerful
Federal government might lead to tyranny. Some opponents held it was
designed to advance the interests of wealthy individuals. Many did
not see any urgency in replacing the Articles of Confederation.
From the point of view of the Founders, the
possibility of war with one or more major European powers was an
inherent danger. An effective national government was believed to be
necessary both to secure against threats and dangers from Europe,
and to try to ensure that future wars would not occur between
independent states in America.
|
|
|
| First
section |
|
Go
back to the previous section of this chapter...
Go
back to the book home page... |
|
Last
section |
|
Previous |
Next |
| Back
to top |
| |